The Calcagno And Goodman Articles - 798 Words

The Calcagno and Goodman articles both have a similar goal with slightly different final trajectories and conclusions. The goal is to bring together biology and anthropology, and encourage cross-disciplinary research and holism within all of anthropologies sub-fields. They both recognize the importance and significance of holism, that has been lacking in the past of anthropology and how this should be improved upon in the future for the benefit of all of human health research. The pair differs in terms of the specifics of how to integrate biology and anthropology. Calcagno focuses on the holistic evidence being the driver to encourage biology in anthropology and anthropology in biology in order to promote holism. In contrast Goodman focuses on incorporating culture into human biology and encourage the use if cross discipline research as a method for achieving this. Calcagno (2003) emphasizes the importance of encouraging biocultural approaches to research. In order to be holistic it is necessary that the research used is widespread across the anthropological sub disciplines (Riley. E, 2006). Calcagno identifies how this approach is easily discussed in practice, but this can be significantly harder to produce successfully in practical settings. The tension surrounding this is due to preceding conflicts in procedures and philosophies disrupting their ability to coexist in the research subfields. Calcagno uses the data collected by Borofsky that indicated the holistic